
👋 Good morning. Chris Dreyer here. Subreddit moderators now ban brands that plant mentions just to get picked up by AI. They don't stop at the account. The firm's name goes on a keyword filter, and every mention gets held for review. Not good.
Then the brief you hand your agency. Most of them never say what the firm actually wants. First problem? Marketers rate their own briefs far higher than agencies do. In fact, one study shows firms risk wasting up to a third of their marketing budget as a result of bad briefs.
And I did a solocast on opening a second office. A real one costs serious money, so you look for the cheap way in: a virtual office. Nothing wrong with that, but cut corners here and your main office's trust rating could drop and never recover. I know one firm that had to start over under a new name. Trust me, you don’t want that headache.
📆 [SAVE THE DATE: Oct. 4-6]
PIMCON, the Personal Injury Mastermind Conference, is where personal injury attorneys master marketing, intake, and explosive firm growth. It's built for decision-makers who want sharper strategy, better execution, and real-world results long after the sessions end.
October 4–6 • Scottsdale, AZ
You get three days with the operators behind the country's fastest-growing PI firms, and the playbooks that got them there. Lock in your spot now.

💡ONE BIG IDEA
How to Open a Second Office the Right Way

Business is good, the cases are coming in, and you want a second office.
Then you look at what one costs. Personal injury is capital intensive on every channel. Google Ads starts around $20,000 to $30,000, radio runs $100,000 to $200,000, and TV lands somewhere between $200,000 and $400,000. A single billboard is $5,000 and up. Programmatic digital boards run closer to $1,500.
So you look for the cheap way in. A virtual office, like a Regus.
Nothing wrong with that. But there's a right way to do it, and getting it wrong puts your main office's trust rating at risk.
Let me explain it this way…
Google wants an employee at that office during the hours you advertise. Say you're open 24/7 and somebody is there at three in the morning. Break that and the listing gets suspended.
The suspension is not even the worst part. Google keeps a trust rating on your Business Profile.
When it's high, your reviews stick, a phone number change just goes through, and you can update your hours. When your trust level drops, Google scrutinizes every one of those changes, and it starts to filter reviews that used to stick. Google doesn't publish them.
Search Console will tell you when you have a manual penalty. Google Business Profile tells you nothing.
And that rating attaches to your main office, the one carrying all your reviews.
Trust me, I've seen this first hand.
We worked with a firm expanding into several cities in one state. They didn’t staff the offices and didn’t open them in good locations.
First, Google suspended every profile. Getting them back meant proving each office was real: utility bills, DBAs, a paper trail for every location. It took a long time, no matter how fast we tried to move.
They got reinstated. But wait for it…
Then somebody reported them. And yes, your competitors will do this. The largest firms in your market will send an investigator to your office, record a video of an empty suite, and turn it in to Google.
Google started filtering their reviews, and eventually new reviews stopped showing up altogether.
At that point the best move is a new firm name, a new DBA, a new email, and you start over.
Don't get me wrong. Sometimes, a second office is worth opening, and it comes down to distance. Proximity is a main ranking factor for local map results and Local Services Ads. Yelp only runs your ads within 20 miles of your office. And when somebody gets hurt, they're likely to call the firm closest to them.
So here's how I'd do it:
Add 20% to 50% to your budget. Under-capitalization is the biggest rule firms break, and John Morgan said the same thing on The Breakfast Club recently. It takes more than you plan for. The organic growth and local brand equity you built at your headquarters don't automatically transfer to a new location. You may have grown up there. You have a sphere of influence. You know the best areas. Go to a different state and you have none of that, and you'll underestimate how many reviews it takes to break through. If the capital isn't there, double down on what already works.
Put a person in the office. Google wants somebody there during the hours you advertise, and it doesn't have to be a lawyer. An intake specialist, a secretary, somebody. Regus works for this. Google used to name virtual offices as the problem, and Regus was the example. They removed that. A suite with your sign and a desk in it is how most attorneys already work. If you ran one for years and Google never dinged you, that's because you're not big enough yet.
Open the first one in the same city. Five to ten miles from your headquarters, assuming your city has at least 100,000 people. Your advertising already works there, and the people you hired probably already live near there. Houston is big enough to hold two. So is New York, and so is the Arizona valley, where everybody lives on top of each other. Let your share of local voice pick the spot. Watch where it starts to drop off at the edges of your area. That's where you look next.
Check the city line before you move. Two or three miles can cross one. A client of ours dominates its market, outgrows its space, moves two or three miles for a bigger building, and loses all its rankings and its visibility. St. Louis and Clayton, Missouri, sit nearly on top of each other, and moving between them costs you your downtown St. Louis visibility. I've seen it in Georgia, too, where the little cities and suburbs run together. Get a market analysis before you decline to renew, not after you move. Check population density while you're in there, because "nobody's competing up here" often means nobody lives up here, either, and you'll sign fewer cases for it.
Watch for the two warning signs. There is no third. You make a change to your profile and it gets suspended on the spot. Or your reviews stop sticking and you can't figure out why.
So go open the second office.
Just make sure you capitalize enough to do it right, because the moment you cut corners to save a little money, you put the market you already own at risk.

♟️STEAL THIS PLAYBOOK
Stop Making Your Agency Guess What You Want

I see this too often: Most creative briefs from law firms don't say what the firm wants.
And the research backs me up…
According to the BetterBriefs Project, 80% of marketers say they're good at writing briefs yet only 10% of agencies agree.
That's from a global study of 1,731 marketers and agency staff, run with the UK's Institute of Practitioners in Advertising.
The same research says that poor briefs and misdirected work waste up to one-third of all marketing budgets.
And it comes down to this: If there is no well-defined marketing strategy in place, there can be no brief.
The study goes further. Marketing professor Mark Ritson, who wrote its strategy section, puts the failure rate at 95% of marketers not providing strategic direction to their agencies, and 60% using the creative process to work out their strategy instead.
Four things fix the problem:
Set a commercial, a behavioral, and an attitudinal objective. The commercial one is the business result: more truck cases in one county. The behavioral one is what a person has to do to get you there: Pick up the phone. The attitudinal one is what they have to believe before they will. BetterBriefs says to link all three, and that objectives are the most critical part of a brief and the most poorly defined.
One brief, one objective. A brief is an exercise in binary thinking. Signing more first-party cases, getting more from your referral sources, and opening a new case type are mutually exclusive when it comes to briefs. Want two of them? Write two briefs.
Size the objective and the audience to the budget. These three lock together, and changing one forces the other two to move. Cut the budget and you make the objective less ambitious and the audience narrower. You can't ask for statewide recognition on money that covers one city. Defining all three also makes the spend easier to justify to your partners.
Agree how you'll judge the work before you see any of it. As briefs go, only 30% of brands have evaluation criteria in place. Without them, everyone judges the work against a private checklist. On one side, the agency's checklist might be clear enough: original, engaging ideas that earn attention. But the client's list, says advertising effectiveness expert James Hurman, is usually built from scraps of advertising dogma picked up from a boss, from marketing books, and from LinkedIn. His fix: get everyone in a room before any work starts and get aligned by reviewing campaigns that won on both creativity and results.
One last thing. Writing the brief is half the job. Delivering it is the other half, and email doesn't cut it. Get the right people in a room so both sides can ask questions and push back before anyone starts work.
🔗 BetterBriefs →

📰 TOP OF THE NEWS
Reddit Moderators Ban Brands That Chase AI Citations

Subreddit moderators now ban brands that plant mentions to get picked up by AI.
There's a reason they've swarmed the site. Reddit was the most-cited domain in May across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google's AI Mode, according to Semrush data compiled for The Verge.
It makes sense to chase those citations, but as with all things marketing, some companies got carried away.
In one case, somebody in r/SkincareAddiction asked whether anyone had tried a particular hypochlorous acid spray. A user replied that they hadn't, but had used a similar spray from Honeydew Labs and liked it.
The issue? The same user had posted similar comments on unrelated threads and in other skincare subreddits. A member flagged it and a moderator took action on the account and set every Honeydew Labs post to filter for review.
Reddit says it now catches 25,000 spammy posts and comments and blocks 23 million spam views a day. It won't say exactly how, because it doesn't want to hand bad actors a way around it.
But the Verge story offers some details:
The ban follows the name, not the account. Moderators don't just remove the poster. The brand goes on a keyword filter, so later mentions get pulled for review whether the brand posted them or not. Moderators of r/loseit keep a standing list of filtered brands. A brand caught promoting itself becomes "persona non grata," says Maya Adivi, a moderator of r/SkincareAddiction.
Moderators read for the things an agency writes. Exact brand names crammed into a comment. Uniformly positive framing. The self-deprecating setup, like "I thought this product would be too aggressive, but it was actually very gentle." Open-ended questions that read like AI prompts. Closing paragraphs that begin "I'm curious to know." Dan, a moderator of r/loseit: "They've got an agenda that a normal poster doesn't have, and that is usually fundamentally what shines through."
One community built an exception. Moderators of r/indieheads found four burner accounts belonging to record labels in a week, all of them posting only about their own artists. The moderators set up a verification process: identify yourself publicly and you can post. Dozens of labels signed up. New anonymous accounts still get banned on discovery.
The suspicion lands hardest on small brands. Adivi says it is often lesser-known brands behaving "egregiously." Skincare subreddits used to turn small brands into cult favorites, and she now wonders whether a new Reddit-approved upstart could take off the way they once did. "The unfortunate thing is it does mean I end up being more suspicious of smaller brands, even though I would love to see more small brands out in the world."
🔗 The Verge →
TikTok Allegedly Withheld a Safety Fix From 15 Million Users to Measure Engagement

A sealed TikTok document says a safety fix was withheld "by design."
TikTok tweaked its algorithm in 2021 to stop overwhelming users with harmful content. By early 2022 it had rolled the safer version out to 90% of US users.
It held back the other 10%, about 15 million people, as a control group to see whether the change made the app less sticky, Bloomberg Businessweek reported.
Chase Nasca, a 16-year-old in Bayport, New York, was in that control group, according to a confidential internal TikTok document. He killed himself in February 2022.
TikTok's algorithm and safety teams reconstructed his watch history in March 2023, after Bloomberg asked about him. Their 14-page review, now under court seal, says the company's filter bubble prevention "did not take effect on this user by design."
The same document calls that "a delicate balance across safety and the ability to measure impact on DAU and core metrics." DAU is daily active users, one of the top numbers Wall Street uses to judge these companies.
Two months later, TikTok answered a written question from Congress about suicides among its users. "TikTok does not believe that use of the platform has caused users to commit suicide," it wrote, on May 4, 2023, 15 months after Chase died.
Congress also asked the company to list every case where algorithmic A/B testing had harmed a user. TikTok's entire answer was a recitation of its Community Guidelines. It made no mention of the backtest.
Chase's parents sued TikTok in New York. A judge dismissed the case last year after the company argued Section 230 shielded it. The plaintiffs plan to appeal.
Plaintiffs have filed more than 4,000 of these suits in four years. One has reached trial, ending in March with a $6 million verdict against Google's YouTube and Meta's Instagram. TikTok has now settled all five cases set for trial this year, including three finalized on Aug. 3.
TikTok told Bloomberg Businessweek it is deeply committed to the safety and well-being of users and continues to invest in trust and safety.
Four more things from the reporting:
Plaintiffs plead design, not speech. PIM covered the study mapping how these complaints get past Section 230: Plaintiffs allege a defectively designed product rather than the publication of harmful speech. Bloomberg reports the document shows TikTok intentionally withheld a safety feature from millions of people, and why.
A wrongful death suit already cites the A/B testing. Plaintiffs filed it in Delaware in July over two young people who died by suicide. Such testing, the complaint says, ended in direct harm to young users: "It's like relaxing the seatbelt standards in a child's car seat to determine whether consumers will buy more of those carseats, knowing that some number of children died in car accidents because of that choice."
TikTok's own review counted the videos. The company analyzed 7,563 videos served to Chase in his final two weeks. It found 73% carried themes of suicide, mental health struggle, or sadness but somehow did not break TikTok's rules. An additional group of videos,almost 10%, did break them, according to Bloomberg.
The report recommended shrinking the test. It proposed cutting the control group to under 1% and the test window from half a year or a full year to seven days. An update inside it warned that even at one-tenth the size, "at least 1.8 million US users have been excluded," putting them "at risk for falling into bubbles."

🚀 QUICK HITS
Connecticut's Top Court Sanctions a Lawyer Over ChatGPT Citations: The Connecticut Supreme Court sanctioned an attorney who filed documents containing what it called "erroneous and unverified citations as a result of the use of generative AI," Reuters reported. It is the court's first ruling on sanctions for AI hallucinations. Ian Gottlieb said the errors came from his use of OpenAI's ChatGPT. He must complete six hours of continuing legal education on ethics and law office management beyond the state's annual requirement. The court said lawyers are personally responsible for the accuracy of everything they file, and that the obligation extends to understanding how the technology may affect attorney-client privilege.
Morris Bart's Hot Sauce Is Selling 2,000 Bottles a Month: Axios New Orleans profiled the personal injury lawyer's move into hot sauce. Bart handed bottles to clients for years, and told Axios it kept his brand on the dinner table as long as the sauce lasted. Clients started coming to the office for it, so he worked with a food scientist on a blend and set up a separate company this year. Rouses Markets sold about 2,000 bottles in the past month, Bart said, and roughly 30 New Orleans restaurants carry it. He is donating all profits to food insecurity nonprofits, this year to Second Harvest.
Tampa General Reports 500% Jump in Child E-Bike Injuries Since 2023: The hospital reported the rise with children aged 12 to 15 hit hardest, according to Axios Tampa Bay. Pediatric surgeon Jade Kumar said children on e-bikes suffer traumatic brain injuries at twice the rate of those on traditional bicycles. Nationally, about 41% of emergency visits for e-bike injuries in 2024 and 2025 involved patients aged 10 to 19, according to National Electronic Injury Surveillance System estimates. Head, face, and neck injuries are the most common type, at 32.4% of all e-bike emergency visits. No federal law regulates e-bike use. Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed a state bill setting speed rules in June, calling it "a little bit of an overreach," the Tallahassee Democrat reported.
Amazon Can't Keep Trucking Expert Out of a Fatal Crash Suit: A federal court in Amarillo denied Amazon's motion to exclude plaintiffs' expert David French on Aug. 4. Noah Leyman's widow sued over the June 2023 crash that killed him, naming four Amazon entities, Timur Trucking, and two drivers. French, who reports more than 45 years in commercial trucking, compared Amazon Relay's contracts, policies, and terms of service against federal safety regulations and commercial practice. Amazon called French’s report ipse dixit with “no identified principles or methods of arriving at his conclusions.” The court rejected both arguments, holding that an expert opinion can rely on experience alone and that experts may read a contract as an industry participant would. "Amazon is welcome to challenge French's underlying assumptions and conclusions upon cross examination," the order says.
Tesla Faces $10 Million Suit Over Test Drive in "Insane" Mode: A Federal Reserve Board employee sued Tesla in the Eastern District of Virginia after crashing a Model Y through the front of an Arlington hair salon on a dealer test drive, Road & Track reported. Alemzewd Lawgalet, 59, says she told staff she had never driven an electric car and was assured the vehicle "operated the same as a gas vehicle." Her complaint alleges employees set the SUV to its "Insane" drive mode, 0 to 60 in 3.3 seconds, without telling her, and that nobody explained regenerative braking. She says the car lurched forward out of proportion to her pressure on the accelerator. She seeks more than $10 million plus $350,000 in punitive damages. Tesla did not comment.

💯 NUMBER TO NOTE

Billboards are the most noticed form of out-of-home advertising in America.
More than two-thirds of American adults notice them, ahead of signs at 59%. The numbers come from YouGov Profiles, a rolling consumer survey run by the market research firm YouGov. Point-of-sale displays and posters both sit at 31%, and digital interactive displays at 26%. That question ran on 405,655 U.S. adults, the largest sample in the report.
Almost everybody notices out-of-home ads. Only 3% of Americans say they never do. 21% notice them multiple times a day, and another 26% several times a week.
Noticing turns into doing. 35% have researched a product or service on their phone after seeing an out-of-home ad. 20% have talked to friends or family about the brand, 19% have made a purchase on their phone, and 15% have walked into a store.
Both actions run about two and a half times higher on a phone. 35% researched on a phone against 14% who researched online without one. 19% bought on a phone against 8% who bought online without one.
If your firm buys boards, this is the most noticed out-of-the-home format in the country, and the most common thing people do after seeing one is search on a phone.
🔗 YouGov →

🎙️ FROM THE POD
John Richmond on Why Elite Firms Don't Operate Like Everyone Else

John Richmond runs almost nothing the standard way, from the job posting to the first phone call.
John Richmond co-founded Richmond Vona in Buffalo, New York, and runs it as CEO. The firm made the Inc. 5000 in 2024, was named an Inc. Best Workplace the same year, and won the Crisp Game Changer Award for Excellence in Firm Culture in 2023. He came up in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation.
In Episode 458 we went through his firm one area at a time: how it markets, who it hires, how it holds people to a number, how it signs cases, and how it looks at them. He does something different in every one, and he says the timing matters now that private equity money and national firms turn up in markets they never entered before.
Don't fight where you're outspent. John's picture of a challenger firm is a fight with Mike Tyson: you don't walk to the center of the ring throwing haymakers. Richmond Vona competed in the same mediums as firms with far bigger budgets and got annihilated on spend, so he brought marketing in-house and pointed the creative at what's authentic to the firm, which is Buffalo and Western New York. He also pulled back from lead generation, where the return was good but the ads carry no mention of your firm. What John wants known is that his firm tries cases, and the insurance companies know which firms will and which won't.
It starts with the job posting. Most read like a firm wanting an attorney who has practiced five years and has a heartbeat, which John calls a travesty. Who wants to work there? Richmond Vona runs a tight hiring funnel, tests every candidate against the firm's values, and checks how badly they want it and whether they can hit a deadline. An A player will outwork four C players, he says, so pay for one rather than hire twice. Culture here is not beanbags and high fives. This is litigation: high stakes, big money, one shot.
Every seat carries a number. Accountability starts at the top and spreads through the leaders you build under you. His director of operations brought in a senior HR manager. Richmond Vona measures a case manager on the days between the medical records arriving and the demand going out, an attorney on percentage of litigation won, marketing on its own benchmarks. The firm doesn't tolerate gossip, and John says it has a reputation for hiring slow and firing very fast.
Sign first, qualify after. The criteria are loose on purpose. About 98% of new clients sign on the first phone call, DocuSigned before they hang up, and the investigation happens after. When the firm can't help, it says so and sometimes refers the client on. Many of those calls come from people who rang a respected legacy firm first that told them to go get the police report and call back. John could list high six- and seven-figure cases that arrived that way, because right after a crash people have no idea how hurt they are.
Look at an ordinary case twice. Product liability cases scare most personal injury lawyers, John says. A premises case or a car crash can carry a defective product, a bad warning, or a design fault somewhere in the chain, and a lawyer reading it only through the premises or auto lens will miss it. His own firm sends auto dealer cases to a firm in California rather than take on the Fords and Toyotas of the world. The difference, in his words, is "your quick $100,000 policy tender and the five, six, seven, $8 million that your client actually deserves."
"Our criteria is loose. We sign on the spot." — John Richmond on intake strategy
The takeaway for PI firms: Look at what your lead spend leaves behind after the case closes. If the answer is nothing, some of that money belongs in marketing that carries your name.
Here's our full conversation:

🤖 AI SEARCH TIP OF THE WEEK
Saying the same thing in every profile changes what AI says about you. Chris Long, who co-founded the AI search agency Nectiv, wanted the models to describe his firm's ideal client a specific way, so he wrote that description into eight places he controlled, from his home page title tag to his own LinkedIn headline to two directory profiles. Within a week, ChatGPT, AI Overviews, and AI Mode all repeated it, sometimes as the first thing they said about the firm.
The action this week: Write one sentence naming the cases you want and the area you cover, then put that exact sentence in your home page title, your About page, every attorney's LinkedIn headline, your firm's LinkedIn page, your Google Business Profile, and your directory listings. A local firm has fewer outside sources shaping how to describe itself than a national brand does, which makes its own profiles count for more.

🛠️ TOOL OF THE WEEK
Paxton Reads the Medical File and Drafts the Demand
Drafting a demand means reading the whole medical file first. Paxton does the reading and drafts the letter from what it finds. It is a general legal AI assistant with a personal injury build aimed at the case file.
Upload the accident report, the insurance policy, and the medical records. Paxton pulls out the facts, builds the treatment timeline, and drafts from what it found. The same account carries a research database of case law, statutes, and regulations for the federal system and all 50 states.
It produces the medical chronology and the billing summary. Paxton lists both features on the entry-level plan, not as add-ons. Paxton also says it flags gaps and inconsistencies in the treatment record.
The demand draws on the file, not a template. Paxton says it writes the demand letter from your accident facts, medical records, and treatment summaries. It drafts complaints, settlement memos, discovery requests, deposition outlines, and deposition summaries the same way.
Research sits next to drafting. You can look up a liability standard or a damages rule in the same account you draft in.
Paxton built it to hold medical records. Paxton reports SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA compliance, and says it does not train on your files.
Paxton is a drafting and research assistant for the case file, not a system that runs your practice. The intake it advertises is processing the forms and records, not answering the phone.
The same page carries a set of numbers: more than 150 million pages of legal and medical records processed, more than 30,000 attorneys on the platform, more than 800,000 legal queries answered, and 94% accuracy on the Stanford Hallucination Benchmark. It also says most attorneys cut drafting and review time by 50% to 70% in their first week. Every one of those figures is Paxton's own, published without a linked source.
Two things to weigh before a firm uploads a client's records. Paxton reports HIPAA compliance, but its own terms state that communications with Paxton are covered by its privacy policy and not by attorney-client privilege or as work product.
And it says plainly that it is not a law firm and cannot give advice, opinions, or strategy, which puts the verification back on the attorney.
Start with one closed file. Run the records through, hold the chronology it builds against the one your team already built, and see whether the demand it drafts is worth editing.
Pricing is $2,999 per user per year on the Individual plan, which Paxton says runs half the monthly rate. Enterprise is custom and priced on case volume, and adds firm-wide access, onboarding, admin controls, and an account manager. Paxton offers a seven-day free trial. It takes a credit card and may place a temporary hold, which Paxton says is not charged.
🔗 Paxton →
Disclaimer: Personal Injury Mastermind takes all reasonable steps to ensure accuracy in the materials we share, including articles, newsletters, and reports. These materials are intended for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They may not reflect the most current laws or regulations. Always consult a qualified attorney for advice on a specific legal matter.

Thanks for reading. Quick ask…if you know someone who’d benefit from this content, please forward this to them. I’ll be back next week. - Chris
Received this newsletter from someone else? Subscribe below. Questions or want to sponsor this newsletter? Contact us at [email protected].


